CSC442 Section B
Fall 2009 Semester
Prof. Burks Oakley II
Final Course Evaluation

(Online evaluation form submitted by 14 students out of the 22 students who received final course grades)

Category 1: Overall Course Management

1.  The course as a whole was:

Excellent (4)
Above average (5)
Average (2)
Below average (2)
Poor (0)
2.  The course topics were well chosen.
Strongly agree (4)
Agree (8)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
3.  The assignments were a good use of my time and effort.
Strongly agree (3)
Agree (6)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
4.  An appropriate amount of work was required in this course.
Strongly agree (4)
Agree (7)
No opinion (0)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
5.  The course was well organized.
Strongly agree (10)
Agree (3)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
Category 2: Student Outcomes of Instruction

6.  I learned things in this course that will be very useful to me in the future.

Strongly agree (4)
Agree (6)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (0)
7.  This course improved my understanding of how the Internet is impacting American life.
Strongly agree (9)
Agree (4)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
8.  This course challenged me to think critically.
Strongly agree (6)
Agree (3)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (4)
Strongly disagree (0)
9.  The course met the objectives that I had at the start of the semester.
Strongly agree (7)
Agree (4)
No opinion (0)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
Category 3: Instructor Characteristics and Style

10.  The instructor's teaching style was appropriate for an online course.

Strongly agree (10)
Agree (2)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
11.  The instructor showed respect and concern for the students.
Strongly agree (9)
Agree (4)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
12.  The instructor communicated ideas and information clearly.
Strongly agree (9)
Agree (4)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
13.  The instructor was always available to help students.
Strongly agree (11)
Agree (2)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
14.  The instructor always gave prompt feedback.
Strongly agree (10)
Agree (4)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
15.  The instructor indicated the relationships of the course content to the world at-large.
Strongly agree (7)
Agree (7)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
16.  The instructor was knowledgeable in the subject matter.
Strongly agree (11)
Agree (3)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
17.  Overall assessment of instructor.
Excellent (8)
Above average (4)
Average (2)
Below average (0)
Poor (0)
Category 4: Instructional Environment

18.  There were positive interactions between the instructor and the students.

Strongly agree (6)
Agree (7)
No opinion (1)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
19.  There was a real community spirit in the interactions among my classmates in the course discussion forum.
Strongly agree (4)
Agree (7)
No opinion (0)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
20.  I felt comfortable using the technologies in this course.
Strongly agree (8)
Agree (6)
No opinion (0)
Disagree (0)
Strongly disagree (0)
21.  The size of the class was:
Way too large (0)
Too large (2)
Just right (12)
Too small (0)
Way too small (0)
Category 5: Student Preferences for Instruction/Learning Style

22.  My learning style is appropriate for an online course.

Strongly agree (5)
Agree (4)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
23.  Listening to the instructor's podcasts was a good use of my time.
Strongly agree (4)
Agree (5)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (2)
Strongly disagree (1)
24.  The course activities helped me learn more than I would have by myself.
Strongly agree (6)
Agree (3)
No opinion (2)
Disagree (3)
Strongly disagree (0)
Category 6: General Comments

25.  What did you like most about this course?

26.  What did you like least about this course? 27.  Would you have been able to take this course if it were not online?
Yes (5)
No (9)
28.  How can this course be improved?
Updated 6 January 2010